A Request for Information does not necessarily mean the underlying building is unsafe.
It may mean the information submitted does not allow the regulator to reach the necessary judgement.
For example, the report might say that compartmentation is satisfactory without explaining how this is known. It might refer to a structural survey without explaining its scope or significant findings. Or it may identify an outstanding action without explaining the timescale, interim measures or why the current risk remains tolerable.
The distinction between having information and demonstrating the safety argument is important.
Next step
Talk to us about reviewing your building safety case
Already have a report? We can look at the risk argument and the evidence behind it.
Find out moreRelated questions
- Why has my safety case report failed?
A safety case can contain a lot of information but still fail to demonstrate that the Principal Accountable Person understands and is managing the building's safety risks.
- What happens if the BSR does not accept a safety case report?
A report that does not adequately demonstrate how building safety risks are managed may lead to requests for further information or contribute to a Building Assessment Certificate application being refused.
- Can you resubmit a safety case report after a BSR refusal?
Yes — but the response should address the underlying risk and evidence issues, not just reword the report.
Building safety legislation, regulation and Building Safety Regulator guidance can change. This page is general information, not legal advice — always refer to current legislation and official guidance for your building.