The terminology is sometimes used interchangeably, but there can be an important distinction.
A safety case review usually considers whether the report is complete, coherent, evidence-led and capable of demonstrating that building safety risks are being appropriately managed.
An audit may go further by independently testing the underlying evidence, processes, records and implementation of the management arrangements described in the report.
Cascade Verify reviews the safety case report provided to it. It does not independently inspect the building or verify that every underlying statement or source document is factually correct.
Next step
Talk to us about reviewing your building safety case
Already have a report? We can look at the risk argument and the evidence behind it.
Find out moreRelated questions
- Where can I get an independent review of my safety case report?
Safety case reports can be independently reviewed by competent building safety, fire and structural professionals. Cascade Verify provides a rapid AI-assisted pre-submission check.
- Does passing an independent safety case review guarantee BSR approval?
No. No independent reviewer or AI tool can guarantee that the Building Safety Regulator will issue a Building Assessment Certificate.
- How should I review my safety case before submitting it to the BSR?
A pre-submission review should test the report against the BSR assessment criteria and ask whether the evidence actually supports the conclusions.
Building safety legislation, regulation and Building Safety Regulator guidance can change. This page is general information, not legal advice — always refer to current legislation and official guidance for your building.
