What is the difference between a safety case audit and a safety case review?

A review usually considers whether the report is complete, coherent and evidence-led. An audit may go further by independently testing underlying evidence and processes.

Cascade Risk Management

The terminology is sometimes used interchangeably, but there can be an important distinction.

A safety case review usually considers whether the report is complete, coherent, evidence-led and capable of demonstrating that building safety risks are being appropriately managed.

An audit may go further by independently testing the underlying evidence, processes, records and implementation of the management arrangements described in the report.

Cascade Verify reviews the safety case report provided to it. It does not independently inspect the building or verify that every underlying statement or source document is factually correct.

Next step

Talk to us about reviewing your building safety case

Already have a report? We can look at the risk argument and the evidence behind it.

Find out more

Related questions

Share with your team

LinkedInEmail

Building safety legislation, regulation and Building Safety Regulator guidance can change. This page is general information, not legal advice — always refer to current legislation and official guidance for your building.