The BSR says there is insufficient evidence. Do I need to commission another survey?

Not necessarily. First establish whether evidence is genuinely missing, or whether the safety case has simply failed to explain the evidence that already exists.

Cascade Risk Management

Not necessarily.

First establish exactly what is missing.

There is an important difference between:

  • No evidence exists

and

  • The safety case has not adequately explained the evidence that already exists.

For example, you may already have a compartmentation survey, structural assessment or FRAEW, but the safety case may fail to explain its scope, limitations, significant findings or what those findings mean for the building's risk.

In that situation, another survey may add little value. The problem may be the safety case argument rather than the underlying evidence.

Where there is a genuine evidence gap, further investigation may be appropriate. However, if the BSR has requested a response within a short period, such as seven days, it may be reasonable to acknowledge the gap and explain:

  • why further information is required
  • what investigation is proposed
  • who will undertake it
  • the intended timescale
  • how risk will be managed in the meantime
  • how the findings will be incorporated into the building safety risk assessment

The appropriate response depends on the significance of the uncertainty and the risk associated with it.

Next step

Talk to us about reviewing your building safety case

Already have a report? We can look at the risk argument and the evidence behind it.

Find out more

Related questions

Share with your team

LinkedInEmail

Building safety legislation, regulation and Building Safety Regulator guidance can change. This page is general information, not legal advice — always refer to current legislation and official guidance for your building.