AI can be used to support safety case quality assurance, but it should not replace competent professional judgement or the responsibilities of the Principal Accountable Person.
A useful AI safety case review should be grounded against defined assessment criteria rather than simply asking a general-purpose AI model whether a report "looks good".
Cascade Verify reviews the submitted report against the current BSR assessment criteria and identifies areas where information, evidence or justification may require attention.
The output should be treated as a quality assurance and decision-support tool, not a guarantee that the Building Safety Regulator will approve an application.
Next step
See how Cascade uses AI to support building safety professionals
AI that helps people find, organise and check information — not replace professional judgement.
Find out moreRelated questions
- Can ChatGPT check my safety case report?
A general-purpose AI tool can help with drafting and summarising, but a meaningful pre-submission check needs to assess the report systematically against BSR criteria.
- How can AI support building safety case preparation?
AI can reduce some of the administrative burden involved in reviewing large volumes of building information.
- Can AI write a building safety case?
AI can assist with preparing a building safety case, but it should not replace competent professional judgement or make building safety risk decisions on behalf of the Accountable Person.
Building safety legislation, regulation and Building Safety Regulator guidance can change. This page is general information, not legal advice — always refer to current legislation and official guidance for your building.